Peran Sistem Sidhikara, Kebendesaan, dan Krama Pura dalam Memperkuat Keharmonisan Umat Hindu di Lombok Perspektif Etnopedagogi

Authors

  • I Gusti Komang Kembarawan Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Gde Pudja Mataram Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63577/wid.v3i01.230

Keywords:

Sidhikara, Kebendesaan, Krama Pura, Social Harmony, Hindu Community, Traditional Social System, Balinese Hindus in Lombok, Cultural Preservation

Abstract

This research, within the sociology of religion and ethnopedagogy, examines the role of the traditional social system of the Balinese Hindu community in Lombok in strengthening harmony among Hindus and maintaining the sustainability of cultural values ​​amidst modernization. The purpose of this research is to analyze the function of the sidhikara, krama pura, banjar, and swakarsa security systems in the socio-religious life of the Hindu community in Lombok, and to examine their implications from an ethnopedagogical perspective as a space for education based on local wisdom. This research uses a qualitative, interpretive approach with a descriptive case study design. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Then, they were analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing using triangulation of sources and methods to ensure data validity. The results indicate that the sidhikara, krama pura, and banjar systems serve as effective social institutions in strengthening solidarity, mutual cooperation, and integration of the religious life of Hindus in Lombok. While swakarsa security reflects the community's adaptive capacity to respond to modern social dynamics without abandoning traditional values. From an ethnopedagogical perspective, these systems also function as informal educational media that transmit moral, social, and religious values ​​through daily life practices, thereby shaping the character and cultural identity of the community in a sustainable manner. This research contributes to strengthening the study of the sociology of religion and ethnopedagogy by emphasizing that traditional social systems not only function structurally but also have an important pedagogical dimension in shaping the values ​​and character of generations. In conclusion, the traditional social system of the Hindu community in Lombok is a strategic social and cultural capital in maintaining harmony, strengthening cultural identity, and supporting local wisdom-based education amidst the challenges of modernization.

References

Abdullah, M. Amin. 1996. Studi Agama: Normativitas atau Historisitas? Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Al-Pansori, M. J., Syahidi, K., & Watoni, M. S. (2024). Integrasi Nilai Agama dalam Tradisi Sasak: Studi Etnopedagogik pada Masyarakat Lombok. Kasta: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan, 4(2), 80-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58218/kasta.v4i2.1372

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dhavamony, Mariasusai. 1995. Fenomenologi Agama. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Geertz, Clifford. 2001. Agama Sebagai Sistem Kebudayaan. Dalam Dekonstruksi Kebenaran: Kritik Tujuh Teori Agama. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.

Giddens, Anthony. 2004. The Constitution of Society. Terjemahan Adi Loka Sujono. Pasuruan: Pedati.

Hamidi. 2004. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Hendropuspito, D. 1983. Sosiologi Agama. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Ibrahim, A. M., Thohri, M., & Maharsi, M. (2024). Changes in Wetu telu Islamic Traditions in the Community of Narmada District, West Lombok Regency from 1998 to 2022. Sabda: Jurnal Kajian Kebudayaan, 19(2), 111-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/sabda.19.2.111-124

Ishomuddin. 2002. Pengantar Sosiologi Agama. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Koentjaraningrat. 1983. Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Koentjaraningrat. 2002. Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Lauer, Robert H. 2003. Perspektif tentang Perubahan Sosial. Terjemahan Alimandan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Miles, Matthew B., dan A. Michael Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Press.

Moleong, Lexy J. 1994. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasikun. 2003. Sistem Sosial Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Nottingham, Elizabeth K. 2002. Agama dan Masyarakat: Suatu Pengantar Sosiologi Agama. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Parimartha, I Gde. 1984. Politik, Perdagangan dan Konflik di Lombok (1831–1891). Jakarta: Tesis Universitas Indonesia.

PHDI. 2000. Himpunan Keputusan Seminar Kesatuan Tafsir terhadap Aspek-Aspek Agama Hindu I–XV. Denpasar: Pemerintah Provinsi Bali.

Ritzer, George. 2004. Teori Sosial Modern. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Sanderson, Stephen K. 2003. Makro Sosiologi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soetrisno, Loekman. 2003. Konflik Sosial: Studi Kasus Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Rajidu Press.

Suprayogo, Imam, dan Tobroni. 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial-Agama. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sztompka, Piotr. 2004. Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Triguna, I.B.Y. 2000. Teori tentang Simbol. Denpasar: Widya Dharma.

Wiana, I Ketut. 2002. Memelihara Tradisi Veda. Denpasar: BP.

Widana, I Gusti Ketut. 2001. Hindu Berkiblat ke India? dan Pertanyaan Lain tentang Hindu. Denpasar: BP.

Wirawan, I.B. 2012. Teori-Teori Sosial dalam Tiga Paradigma. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Peran Sistem Sidhikara, Kebendesaan, dan Krama Pura dalam Memperkuat Keharmonisan Umat Hindu di Lombok Perspektif Etnopedagogi. (2025). Widya : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(01), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.63577/wid.v3i01.230

Most read articles by the same author(s)